Fire and rescue service · Minnesota

City of Edina - Fire Station 1

Edina, MN · ~58 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and rescue service workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Edina - Fire Station 1: 10.3 TCR = 323% of Fire and rescue service BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 safety composite

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2023

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 injury rate improved

City of Edina - Fire Station 1's TCR fell 6.7 from 14.8 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.8 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Edina, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 323% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #18/38
  • PHOTO Apex Fire Systems Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Apex Fire Systems Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Edina - Fire Station 1 averages 10.3 TCR (323% of the Fire and rescue service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 TCR series: 2017=14.8 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=8.1 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Edina - Fire Station 1 falls in its industry

793 Fire and rescue service establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 38 Fire and rescue service employers in Minnesota.

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 (58 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Edina - Fire Station 1
City of Edina - Fire Station 1 (58 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City of Edina - Fire Station 1 has more employees than the Fire and rescue service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.1 8.1 2 0 0
2022 17.9 14.9 4 2 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 1 0
2020 11.1 11.1 5 1 0
2019 10.5 6.3 4 1 0
2018 7.4 2.5 2 1 0
2017 14.8 14.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · MN · Edina

793 Fire and rescue service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 201 employers in Edina, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Apex Fire Systems Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of New Haven - FIRE 120 Ellsworth Avenue 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 078 SHERMAN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of MN - Otsego 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms SE Misc MN 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN (Monsanto Co.) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoenecker's Inc d.b.a BI WORLDWIDE 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Fire Protection Group 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 - Edina 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Apex Fire Systems Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Raco Steel Company 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepsi-Cola of Great Falls 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nam Dae Mun Farmers Market Norcross 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Tool & Machine Corporation 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accura HealthCare of Carroll 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office & Thermoforming 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.