Executive and legislative office combinations · North Carolina

City of Elizabeth City

Elizabeth City, NC · ~401 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Elizabeth City runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Elizabeth City: 4.9 TCR = 152% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Elizabeth City safety composite

City of Elizabeth City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2018→2024

City of Elizabeth City injury rate improved

City of Elizabeth City's TCR fell 10.2 from 11.7 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.7 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Elizabeth City, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 152% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #19/34
  • PHOTO Town of Smyrna Stree…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~401 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Smyrna Streets and Vehicle Maintenace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Elizabeth City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Elizabeth City averages 4.9 TCR (152% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Elizabeth City TCR series: 2018=11.7 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Elizabeth City falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 34 Executive and legislative offi employers in North Carolina.

City of Elizabeth City (401 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Elizabeth City
City of Elizabeth City (401 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Elizabeth City has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.1 3 1 0
2023 0.9 0.9 5 0 0
2022 4.2 3.5 12 0 0
2021 3.1 1.7 4 5 0
2020 6.3 2.8 9 9 0
2019 6.3 4.2 16 2 0
2018 11.7 3.2 23 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · NC · Elizabeth City

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 57 employers in Elizabeth City, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Smyrna Streets and Vehicle Maintenace 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Smyrna Justice Center 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Onalaska 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Las Vegas 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raleigh - 901 Main Campus Drive 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1321 401 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dorada Foods Reidsville 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3503 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elizabeth City State University 734 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1527 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1527 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR VectorCSP 209 FTE
NAT-TCR Pdp LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Sinai Beth Israel 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Channahon 041 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shop Rite of Bruckner Blvd 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Region 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ventura County Probation Agency 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Welded Product, LLC 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spacesaver Corp 401 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.