General medical and surgical hospitals · New York

Mount Sinai Beth Israel

Ny, NY · ~3,062 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount Sinai Beth Israel runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Mount Sinai Beth Israel: 4.9 TCR = 65% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount Sinai Beth Israel safety composite

Mount Sinai Beth Israel scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2024

Mount Sinai Beth Israel injury rate improved

Mount Sinai Beth Israel's TCR fell 2.0 from 3.8 in 2018 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Ny, NY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 4.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #178/296
  • PHOTO AdventHealth Manches…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 806 inj
  • SIZE ~3,062 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AdventHealth Manchester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mount Sinai Beth Israel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount Sinai Beth Israel averages 4.9 TCR (65% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount Sinai Beth Israel TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 7.5

Where Mount Sinai Beth Israel falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #178 safest of 296 General medical and surgical h employers in New York.

Mount Sinai Beth Israel (3,062 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Sinai Beth Israel
Mount Sinai Beth Israel (3,062 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mount Sinai Beth Israel has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.9 32 3 0
2023 3.5 2.0 83 1 0
2022 5.9 2.8 116 4 0
2021 7.4 3.7 139 13 0
2020 8.3 5.4 112 68 0
2019 3.5 1.1 126 0 0
2018 3.8 1.7 198 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · NY · Ny

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 41 employers in Ny, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Manchester 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ND,Fargo-South University Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXAUS41 ASCENSION SETON MEDICAL CTR HAYS 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Regional Medical Ctr 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ellis Hospital 3,061 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Sinai St. Luke's 3,066 FTE
STATE-SIZE ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL & HEART CENTER 3,070 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flatiron Health, Inc 3,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coty USLLC 2,168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Union Square 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArchCare 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR FSE East Side Access 322 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Pet - Aurora 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Elizabeth City 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR John G. Shedd Aquarium 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tim Chesney Miami Covington 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cook Incorporated Park 48 3,062 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kent General Hospital 3,064 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maricopa Medical Center 3,058 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.