Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · North Carolina

City of Greensboro- coliseum

Greensboro, NC · ~109 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Greensboro- coliseum runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Greensboro- coliseum: 4.1 TCR = 129% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Greensboro- coliseum safety composite

City of Greensboro- coliseum scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Greensboro- coliseum: 4.1 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

City of Greensboro- coliseum's TCR rose 2.3 from 4.1 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #29/47
  • PHOTO Chippewa County
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chippewa County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Greensboro- coliseum in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Greensboro- coliseum averages 4.1 TCR (129% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Greensboro- coliseum TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Greensboro- coliseum falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 47 Executive offices, federal, st employers in North Carolina.

City of Greensboro- coliseum (109 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Greensboro- coliseum
City of Greensboro- coliseum (109 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

City of Greensboro- coliseum has fewer employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 4.8 4 0 0
2023 1.9 1.0 2 0 0
2022 4.1 1.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · NC · Greensboro

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chippewa County 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Richmond 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dutchess County Government 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of St. Michael 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Primoris T&D Services - Charlotte 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Graham 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid Atlantic Infrastructure Systems Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaines and company Inc 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Donaldson Company, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plymouth Office 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 343006-Columbia | MO | MIZ-000 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Frank Roberts & Sons, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alden of Waterford Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Custom Built, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farm and Fleet of Morton 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Don Wartko Construction, Inc. 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.