Water treatment and distribution · North Carolina

City of Greensboro- Water Resources

Greensboro, NC · ~446 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Greensboro- Water Resources runs at 638% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Greensboro- Water Resources: 7.7 TCR = 638% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Greensboro- Water Resources safety composite

City of Greensboro- Water Resources scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Greensboro- Water Resources: 6.2 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

City of Greensboro- Water Resources's TCR rose 2.2 from 6.2 in 2022 to 8.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 638% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #26/33
  • PHOTO Fayetteville GA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~446 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fayetteville GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

City of Greensboro- Water Resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Greensboro- Water Resources averages 7.7 TCR (638% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Greensboro- Water Resources TCR series: 2022=6.2 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 1.2

Where City of Greensboro- Water Resources falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 33 Water treatment and distributi employers in North Carolina.

City of Greensboro- Water Resources (446 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Greensboro- Water Resources
City of Greensboro- Water Resources (446 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

City of Greensboro- Water Resources has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 5.4 29 4 0
2023 8.3 5.8 27 0 0
2022 6.2 3.1 16 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · NC · Greensboro

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fayetteville GA 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laguna Beach County Water District 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Department 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Operations Center 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Raleigh- Parks & Recreation 446 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office PNG 447 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPC Mechanical Corporation 447 FTE
STATE-SIZE T5 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR 483013-Prospect | PA | HOL-500 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Elburn & Countryside Fire Protection District 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2032 - Winter Park 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Knudson Lumber Co. 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mile Bluff Medical Center 446 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shive-Hattery Group, Inc. 446 FTE
NAT-SIZE PlayCore Wisconsin, Inc., dba GameTime 446 FTE
NAT-SIZE Affinity Waste Solutions 446 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.