General public administration · Minnesota

City of Mendota Heights-Fire

Mendota Heights, MN · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Mendota Heights-Fire runs at 642% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Mendota Heights-Fire: 20.5 TCR = 642% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Mendota Heights-Fire safety composite

City of Mendota Heights-Fire scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.9

2017→2024

City of Mendota Heights-Fire injury rate improved

City of Mendota Heights-Fire's TCR fell 26.9 from 45.6 in 2017 to 18.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 45.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=45.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=20.6 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=39.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=18.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Mendota Heights, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.5 · 642% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #270/275
  • PHOTO Town of Avon - Depar…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Avon - Department of Public Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Mendota Heights-Fire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Mendota Heights-Fire averages 20.5 TCR (642% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Mendota Heights-Fire TCR series: 2017=45.6 · 2018=0 · 2020=20.6 · 2021=18.8 · 2022=39.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=18.7 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Mendota Heights-Fire falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #270 safest of 275 General public administration employers in Minnesota.

City of Mendota Heights-Fire (33 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Mendota Heights-Fire
City of Mendota Heights-Fire (33 employees, TCR 20.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

City of Mendota Heights-Fire has fewer employees than the General public administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 39.9 0.0 1 1 0
2021 18.8 18.8 1 0 0
2020 20.6 20.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 45.6 22.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Mendota Heights

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 51 employers in Mendota Heights, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Avon - Department of Public Works 20.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of San Bernardino 20.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuba County Sheriff 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR POLICE DEPARTMENT-39675 W CIVIC CENTER PLZ 20.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perham Egg LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gorans Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Raiders 17150004 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loeffler Construction & Consulting 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patterson Companies, Inc 851 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patterson Corporate Headquarters 783 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Patterson Companies, Inc (FSS) 369 FTE
NAT-TCR MDWMCCOOKIL 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WST 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pw Utilities - Water Line & Fire Hydrant Repair 20.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DIRTT Environmental Solutions Phoenix 20.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harris Industrial Gases - Citrus Heights 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterloo 144 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spokane 232 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Boston 103 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.