Parks and recreation commission, government · Connecticut

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road

Hamden, CT · ~139 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road runs at 753% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road: 24.1 TCR = 753% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road safety composite

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.1

2017→2018

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road injury rate improved

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road's TCR fell 22.1 from 35.1 in 2017 to 13.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 35.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=35.1 · 2018=13.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Hamden, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 24.1 · 753% of ind

  • DART 13.1 DART
  • RANK #28/28
  • PHOTO Parks & Recreation
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parks & Recreation (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road averages 24.1 TCR (753% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road TCR series: 2017=35.1 · 2018=13.1 · BLS 3.2

Where City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 28 Parks and recreation commissio employers in Connecticut.

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road (139 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road
City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road (139 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of New Haven Parks - 180 Park Road has more employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 13.1 13.1 12 0 0
2017 35.1 10.6 27 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CT · Hamden

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 80 employers in Hamden, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parks & Recreation 23.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Algin Sutton RC 24.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR John C. Argue Swim Stadium 26.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Meadows RC 21.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2967-CT112 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.W. Hastings & Co., LLC 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2910 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Naugatuck 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTtransit 1,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitney Center 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamden Markets LLC, dba ShopRite of Hamden 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arden House 226 FTE
NAT-TCR iFLY Dallas 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillcrest Educational Centers - Brookside / ITU Campus 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 250140-Allegan Po 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EHP - Jackson 24.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1004-14 GoJet Headquarters STL 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Emerald Beach Resort 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Open Systems Healthcare - NE Philly 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associate Milk Producers Inc (Jim Falls) 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.