Landscape care and maintenance services · Maryland

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities

Rockville, MD · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities: 9.0 TCR = 200% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities safety composite

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2020→2023

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities injury rate improved

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities's TCR fell 1.4 from 9.9 in 2020 to 8.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.9 · 2021=8.7 · 2023=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Rockville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 200% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #50/59
  • PHOTO James River Grounds …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: James River Grounds Management 719 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Rockville Parks & Facilities averages 9.0 TCR (200% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities TCR series: 2020=9.9 · 2021=8.7 · 2023=8.4 · BLS 4.5

Where City of Rockville Parks & Facilities falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 59 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Maryland.

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities (57 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Rockville Parks & Facilities
City of Rockville Parks & Facilities (57 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

City of Rockville Parks & Facilities has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.4 6.3 4 0 0
2021 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2020 9.9 9.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MD · Rockville

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 225 employers in Rockville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR James River Grounds Management 719 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seed Slingers 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Natorp's Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Beach 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5901 COBB RD FACILITY 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group - Metro 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chamberlain Contractors, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royals Commercial of Maryland- Alpha #138 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health Shady Grove Medical Center 2,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare Shady Grove Medical Center 2,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shady Grove Adventist Hospital 2,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOM's Organic Market 1,354 FTE
NAT-TCR FT. Lauderdale, FL (PEV) 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Plains Atkinson LLC 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sand Lake Plant - 01 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Drv LLC 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swansea RHCC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vandalia RHCC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Daele Homes 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Carolina Holdings, LLC 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.