Ambulance and fire service combined · Michigan

City of Roseville Fire Department

Roseville, MI · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Roseville Fire Department runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance and fire service combined workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Roseville Fire Department: 12.8 TCR = 398% of Ambulance and fire service combined BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Roseville Fire Department safety composite

City of Roseville Fire Department scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 12.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

City of Roseville Fire Department injury rate improved

City of Roseville Fire Department's TCR fell 5.1 from 10.6 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.6 · 2017=15.8 · 2018=28.3 · 2019=20.6 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Roseville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 398% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #20/29
  • PHOTO Clarendon Hills Fire…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clarendon Hills Fire Department (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

City of Roseville Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Roseville Fire Department averages 12.8 TCR (398% of the Ambulance and fire service combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Roseville Fire Department TCR series: 2016=10.6 · 2017=15.8 · 2018=28.3 · 2019=20.6 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Roseville Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Ambulance and fire service com establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 29 Ambulance and fire service com employers in Michigan.

City of Roseville Fire Department (46 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Roseville Fire Department
City of Roseville Fire Department (46 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

City of Roseville Fire Department has fewer employees than the Ambulance and fire service combined median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 2.8 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.9 1.4 5 0 0
2021 12.3 2.7 9 0 0
2020 14.6 3.6 8 0 0
2019 20.6 2.9 14 0 0
2018 28.3 5.0 17 0 0
2017 15.8 0.0 11 0 0
2016 10.6 6.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · MI · Roseville

793 Ambulance and fire service combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clarendon Hills Fire Department 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Station #1 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Guilford Fire Department 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest St. Clair County Fire Fire Protection District 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solution Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBA FALKNER FARMS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROB MAINTENANCE 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDL Energy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR The Park Oak Grove 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Christian Home Association 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0427 Houston 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pallet Source, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Cleveland 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Short Pump #612 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Florence 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE POET BioRefining Emmetsburg 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.