Community recreation programs · California

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department

Santa Rosa, CA · ~225 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs workplace, earning a grade F.

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department: 8.3 TCR = 260% of Community recreation programs BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department safety composite

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2018→2020

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department injury rate improved

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department's TCR fell 5.2 from 8.3 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.3 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 260% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #54/96
  • PHOTO Conejo Recreation an…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Conejo Recreation and Park District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department averages 8.3 TCR (260% of the Community recreation programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department TCR series: 2018=8.3 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=3.1 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 96 Community recreation programs employers in California.

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department (225 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department
City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department (225 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of Santa Rosa - Recreation & Parks Department has more employees than the Community recreation programs median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2019 13.7 11.6 12 1 0
2018 8.3 5.8 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CA · Santa Rosa

413 Community recreation programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Conejo Recreation and Park District 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks and Recreation 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreation & Parks 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trinity Packing Company 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floradale 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE CINNABAR SERVICE CENTER 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresno Water Division 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutchmen Plant 801 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Manufacturing 812 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Carson City 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozarks Coca-Cola/Dr Pepper Bottling Company 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Givaudan Devon 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hub City, Inc. 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 7L Lawrenceville 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer 160 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.