Parks and recreation commission, government · California

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation

South San Francisco, CA · ~381 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Parks and recreation commission, government workplace, earning a grade F.

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation: 7.2 TCR = 225% of Parks and recreation commission, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation safety composite

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2023→2024

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation injury rate improved

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation's TCR fell 3.2 from 8.8 in 2023 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=8.8 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · South San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 225% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #48/96
  • PHOTO Historic Wagner Farm
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~381 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Historic Wagner Farm (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation averages 7.2 TCR (225% of the Parks and recreation commission, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2023=8.8 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.2

Where City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

413 Parks and recreation commissio establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 96 Parks and recreation commissio employers in California.

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation (381 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation
City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation (381 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of South San Francisco - Parks and Recreation has more employees than the Parks and recreation commission, governm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 4.9 8 0 0
2023 8.8 5.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CA · South San Francisco

413 Parks and recreation commission, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 136 employers in South San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Historic Wagner Farm 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EI050 - Two Harbors Office 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Township Park District 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hubert Humphrey RC 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elite Ag Services 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Region 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE ETS Express, LLC - CA 381 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2471 - Menifee 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genentech SSF 13,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120951 1,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspiranet 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620951 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Maintainer Corporation of Iowa 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alaska Pacific Seafoods 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Elderhaus PACE 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Idaho Industrial Sales, Inc 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SAC Wireless 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport GO - Stephens 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain Stryker 381 FTE
NAT-SIZE Developmental Pathways 381 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.