Recreational sports club facilities · Minnesota

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center

Woodbury, MN · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recreational sports club facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center: 5.2 TCR = 167% of Recreational sports club facilities BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center safety composite

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center: 0.0 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center's TCR rose 7.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 7.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Woodbury, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO 59 Lincoln Road
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 59 Lincoln Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center averages 5.2 TCR (167% of the Recreational sports club facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=8 · 2024=7.6 · BLS 3.1

Where City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center falls in its industry

629 Recreational sports club facil establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Recreational sports club facil employers in Minnesota.

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center (29 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center
City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center (29 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

City of Woodbury - M Health Fairview Sports Center has fewer employees than the Recreational sports club facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.0 8.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · MN · Woodbury

629 Recreational sports club facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 151 employers in Woodbury, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 59 Lincoln Road 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Rim North City 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norman OK 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitness Connection Lewisville 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR MasTec Utility Services, LLC 4,307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Services Group 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthEast -Woodwinds Hospital 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodwinds Hospital 903 FTE
NAT-TCR B & B Trucking, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Helwig Carbon Products, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Honda of Sarasota 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR East Liberty 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Andersen Logistics - Denver 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pierre Store 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardner Logging Services Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davitt Design Build, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.