Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Arizona

Civitan Foundation

Phoenix, AZ · ~277 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Civitan Foundation runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Civitan Foundation: 1.3 TCR = 34% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Civitan Foundation safety composite

Civitan Foundation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Civitan Foundation: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2023

Civitan Foundation's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO Villa Grove
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~277 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villa Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Civitan Foundation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Civitan Foundation averages 1.3 TCR (34% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Civitan Foundation TCR series: 2020=0 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Civitan Foundation falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Day care centers for disabled employers in Arizona.

Civitan Foundation (277 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Civitan Foundation
Civitan Foundation (277 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Civitan Foundation has more employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 1.9 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · AZ · Phoenix

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villa Grove 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELC-TMI-EL CENTRO OFFICE 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rever Grand 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Casa Grande Price Industries 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Alaska Reservations 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0400 GEODIS LOGISTICS 277 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chamberlain Group Inc (Tucson TSC) 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Triple D Uniform 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Total Printing Systems 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Raynham 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fabco Metal Products 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kalwall Corporation-Panel & Accessories 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Effingham Il Industrial 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sugar Foods Corporation 277 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Powdered Metal Company STM 277 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.