Telecommunications carriers, wired · Puerto Rico

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey

Cayey, PR · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey: 2.9 TCR = 414% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey safety composite

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2020

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey injury rate improved

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey's TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Cayey, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 414% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/71
  • PHOTO CLARO / PRT - Centro…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Guaynabo Esmeralda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey averages 2.9 TCR (414% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 0.7

Where CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 71 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Puerto Rico.

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey (32 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey
CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey (32 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Cayey has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2016 6.8 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · PR · Cayey

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 22 employers in Cayey, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Guaynabo Esmeralda 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massillon Cable TV, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mediacom Springfield 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR XIT Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE LUMA, San German Fleet Operations Warehouse 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Vega Baja Fleet Operations and Warehouse 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE CARDINAL HEALTH PS San Lucas 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepe Ganga Guaynabo 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2721 686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottler 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2721 547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottlers Cayey 521 FTE
NAT-TCR Sharp Rees-Stealy-LMW 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Power-Neenah, WI 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Packaging Specialties Inc. (Arkansas) 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Catholic Community Services-Sierra Vista 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE G&G Electric Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE LSBV 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alcal Escondido Multi-Product 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of the Great Plains Rapid City 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.