Wrecking, building or other structure · California

Clauss Construction San Diego

Lakeside, CA · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clauss Construction San Diego runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wrecking, building or other structure workplace, earning a grade C.

Clauss Construction San Diego: 2.9 TCR = 104% of Wrecking, building or other structure BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clauss Construction San Diego safety composite

Clauss Construction San Diego scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Clauss Construction San Diego injury rate improved

Clauss Construction San Diego's TCR fell 2.5 from 5.9 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Lakeside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 104% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #99/184
  • PHOTO R&G Excavating Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R&G Excavating Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Clauss Construction San Diego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clauss Construction San Diego averages 2.9 TCR (104% of the Wrecking, building or other structure BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clauss Construction San Diego TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Clauss Construction San Diego falls in its industry

1,750 Wrecking, building or other st establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 184 Wrecking, building or other st employers in California.

Clauss Construction San Diego (71 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Clauss Construction San Diego
Clauss Construction San Diego (71 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Clauss Construction San Diego has more employees than the Wrecking, building or other structure median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 5.4 3.6 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.9 3.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · CA · Lakeside

1,750 Wrecking, building or other structure employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 55 employers in Lakeside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R&G Excavating Inc 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR F.M. Kitchens Construction Services LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Contractors 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR James McMinn Inc 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Pineda Farming Co 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE AgSource Services, LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schafer Ranch, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & J Dondero Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barona Resort & Casino 2,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKESIDE CA (SAN DIEGO) 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKESIDE CA SAN DIEGO 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM Ortega (Lakeside) 249 FTE
NAT-TCR Fortis Security Products 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Treatment Plant 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. - Waverly 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mac's Snacks 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midland TX 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signature Construction LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeff Eubank Roofing 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 501BLM 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.