General public administration · Minnesota

Clay County - Maintenance

Moorhead, MN · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clay County - Maintenance runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade C.

Clay County - Maintenance: 3.8 TCR = 118% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clay County - Maintenance safety composite

Clay County - Maintenance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2017→2024

Clay County - Maintenance injury rate improved

Clay County - Maintenance's TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Moorhead, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #111/275
  • PHOTO Berry Creek Rancheri…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Clay County - Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clay County - Maintenance averages 3.8 TCR (118% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clay County - Maintenance TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=6 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Clay County - Maintenance falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 275 General public administration employers in Minnesota.

Clay County - Maintenance (23 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Clay County - Maintenance
Clay County - Maintenance (23 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Clay County - Maintenance has fewer employees than the General public administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.7 7.7 1 0 0
2020 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Moorhead

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Moorhead, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Simsbury Parks and Recreation 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Ventura-Auditor Controller's Office 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elizabeth City State University 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University Moorhead 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Moorhead 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eventide on Eighth 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Crystal Sugar Company Moorhead 387 FTE
NAT-TCR White Knight Fluid Handling 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Clinic Rehabilitation Hospital - Edwin Shaw (Akron) 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 50038 - Capstone Kroger Tolleson 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vortex Colorado - SLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diablo Timber 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buttonwillow Warehouse - Delano Facility 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maddox Farms (RuAnn Location) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.