Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Utah

Vortex Colorado - SLC

Salt Lake City, UT · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Vortex Colorado - SLC runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Vortex Colorado - SLC: 3.8 TCR = 135% of Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Vortex Colorado - SLC safety composite

Vortex Colorado - SLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Vortex Colorado - SLC held a steady TCR band

Vortex Colorado - SLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=18.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO Virginia Riggers Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Virginia Riggers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Vortex Colorado - SLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Vortex Colorado - SLC averages 3.8 TCR (135% of the Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Vortex Colorado - SLC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=18.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Vortex Colorado - SLC falls in its industry

1,138 Door, commercial- or industria establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Door, commercial- or industria employers in Utah.

Vortex Colorado - SLC (24 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Vortex Colorado - SLC
Vortex Colorado - SLC (24 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Vortex Colorado - SLC has fewer employees than the Door, commercial- or industrial-type, in median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 18.7 18.7 4 0 0
2022 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · UT · Salt Lake City

1,138 Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Virginia Riggers Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tee Jay Service Company 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Access Elevators, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-DC NE 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARM 42106 SOW -EST 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perco Rock Company 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00567 PARK CITY SERV CTR 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highmark Construction 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Cleveland Clinic Rehabilitation Hospital - Edwin Shaw (Akron) 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clay County - Maintenance 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S04133 - WM of NY Rochester Webster 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lancaster Public School 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunsweet Dryer - Hamilton City 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilson Farms Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pentagon Plumbing 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.