Construction machinery manufacturing · North Carolina

Clayton Facility

Clayton, NC · ~408 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clayton Facility runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Clayton Facility: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Construction machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clayton Facility safety composite

Clayton Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clayton Facility: 0.3 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2061.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Clayton Facility's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2061.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Clayton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Somero Enterprises, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~408 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Somero Enterprises, Inc. - Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Clayton Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clayton Facility averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Construction machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clayton Facility TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=2061.9 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Clayton Facility falls in its industry

400 Construction machinery manufac establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Construction machinery manufac employers in North Carolina.

Clayton Facility (408 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clayton Facility
Clayton Facility (408 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Clayton Facility has more employees than the Construction machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.5 3 0 0
2023 2061.9 1030.9 4 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 5 0 0
2021 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.6 4 0 0
2018 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · NC · Clayton

400 Construction machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Somero Enterprises, Inc. - Florida 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manitowoc Cranes Inc- Manitowoc, WI 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Komatsu 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roadtec, Inc. Manufacturers Rd. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lilly Research Triangle Park 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kearfott Corporation 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grady White Boats, Inc. 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1238 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Florence Electric 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greene Tweed and Company Houston 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenn H. Johnson Construction Co. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE OTC - Omaha 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain : Monogram Refrigeration, LLC, Selmer, TN 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Financial Services, Inc 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greystone Programs, Inc. 408 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.