Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · North Carolina

Lilly Research Triangle Park

Durham, NC · ~408 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lilly Research Triangle Park runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Lilly Research Triangle Park: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lilly Research Triangle Park safety composite

Lilly Research Triangle Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lilly Research Triangle Park: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Lilly Research Triangle Park's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #23/47
  • PHOTO Halo Pharmaceutical,…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~408 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Halo Pharmaceutical, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lilly Research Triangle Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lilly Research Triangle Park averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lilly Research Triangle Park TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Lilly Research Triangle Park falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 47 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in North Carolina.

Lilly Research Triangle Park (408 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lilly Research Triangle Park
Lilly Research Triangle Park (408 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Lilly Research Triangle Park has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 13 0 0
2023 1.3 0.2 6 0 0
2022 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · NC · Durham

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Halo Pharmaceutical, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kindeva Drug Delivery - Northridge 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR McNeil Health Care, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INCOG BioPharma Services Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clayton Facility 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kearfott Corporation 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grady White Boats, Inc. 409 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1238 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Alarm-Tech Security Systems, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tyler Sc&Trans 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Svc Ctr 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1749 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Marks Powders, Inc 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SDC1 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Contracting Co. 408 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis College of Art and Design 408 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.