Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, stools, tool stands, work benches), manufacturing · Minnesota

Clean Air Products

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~58 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clean Air Products runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, stools, tool stands, work benches), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Clean Air Products: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, stools, tool stands, work benches), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clean Air Products safety composite

Clean Air Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Clean Air Products: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.45× in 2024

Clean Air Products's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337127 · Brooklyn Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO Columbia Manufacturi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Manufacturing Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Clean Air Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clean Air Products averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, stools, tool stands, work benches), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clean Air Products TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=10 · 2021=6 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Clean Air Products falls in its industry

208 Furniture, factory-type (e.g., establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Furniture, factory-type (e.g., employers in Minnesota.

Clean Air Products (58 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Clean Air Products
Clean Air Products (58 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Clean Air Products has fewer employees than the Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 3 0 0
2021 6.0 1.5 4 0 0
2020 10.0 4.3 7 0 0
2019 5.8 1.4 4 0 0
2018 6.7 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337127 · MN · Brooklyn Park

208 Furniture, factory-type (e.g., cabinets, stools, tool stands, work benches), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Manufacturing Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Cascade Company 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amtekco Industries 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hussey Seating Company 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of MN - Otsego 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms SE Misc MN 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN (Monsanto Co.) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. - Chickasha 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Don Young Company, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutherlands Home Base - Mineral Wells 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Reich LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cape Leisure Silver Springs, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. - Waverly 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abw 114/118 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.