Security and fire system, installation only · California

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc.

Crockett, CA · ~58 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Security and fire system, installation only workplace, earning a grade A.

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 23% of Security and fire system, installation only BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. safety composite

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2024

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Crockett, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/548
  • PHOTO Robinson Electric
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Robinson Electric (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (23% of the Security and fire system, installation only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Security and fire system, inst establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 548 Security and fire system, inst employers in California.

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc.
Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Intrepid Electronic Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Security and fire system, installation o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Crockett

4,550 Security and fire system, installation only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Robinson Electric 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Xtreme Powerline Construction Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hays Electrical Services Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SunPower Corp. - SPEB 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR C&H Sugar 465 FTE
NAT-TCR Metals USA-Philadelphia Flat Rolled 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc. LaSalle Facility 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Marking Services Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Chester 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pier Foundry & Pattern Shop, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Knoll 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1038 Taylorsville 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.