Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Clear Lake Oxbo

Clear Lake, WI · ~170 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clear Lake Oxbo runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Clear Lake Oxbo: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clear Lake Oxbo safety composite

Clear Lake Oxbo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Clear Lake Oxbo injury rate improved

Clear Lake Oxbo's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Clear Lake, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #4/24
  • PHOTO GUSS Automation, LLC.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GUSS Automation, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Clear Lake Oxbo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clear Lake Oxbo averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clear Lake Oxbo TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Clear Lake Oxbo falls in its industry

433 Harvesting machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 24 Harvesting machinery and equip employers in Wisconsin.

Clear Lake Oxbo (170 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clear Lake Oxbo
Clear Lake Oxbo (170 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Clear Lake Oxbo has more employees than the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2020 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 4 0 0
2018 2.3 1.4 5 0 0
2017 2.8 2.2 5 0 0
2016 2.8 1.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · WI · Clear Lake

433 Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 6 employers in Clear Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GUSS Automation, LLC. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGCO Hesston 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bush Hog Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.H.O. Manufacturing Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Foods Inc. 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiel 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitehall East 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE I-K-I Manufacturing 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR AFP Clear Lake 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR AFP advanced food products llc 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Specialty Coating Systems Clear Lake 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR UniPunch Products, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Highlands 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Roseville Hall/Library 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisburg 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Packaging Corporation EL&C 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE McGinnis Wood Products, Inc. 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jowat Corporation 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Contracting & Services Inc. 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.