Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturing · North Carolina

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals

Raleigh, NC · ~200 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals safety composite

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals injury rate improved

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=1.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325411 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO APS Grupa, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: APS Grupa, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=1.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals falls in its industry

260 Amphetamines, uncompounded, ma establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Amphetamines, uncompounded, ma employers in North Carolina.

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (200 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals
Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (200 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals has more employees than the Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.8 3 0 0
2023 1.7 1.3 4 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 3 1 0
2020 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 6 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 3 0 0
2016 3.6 3.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325411 · NC · Raleigh

260 Amphetamines, uncompounded, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR APS Grupa, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siegfried-USA LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Old Belt Extracts dba Open Book Extracts 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vitaquest International, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Electric Membership Cooperative 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE KDH Defense Systems 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2650 LOWE S OF BELMONT NC 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Season 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Highlands 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clear Lake Oxbo 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Anchor Lamina America Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dyer Foods Rite 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dart Container MTM 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawson Products-McCook DC 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount Carmel Franklinton 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starcon - South 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.