Steel manufacturing · Indiana

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate

Burns Harbor, IN · ~357 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Steel manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Steel manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate safety composite

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate held a steady TCR band

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Burns Harbor, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/42
  • PHOTO Grant Street
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~357 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grant Street (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Steel manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate falls in its industry

416 Steel manufacturing establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 42 Steel manufacturing employers in Indiana.

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate (357 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate
Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate (357 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate has more employees than the Steel manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Burns Harbor

416 Steel manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 18 employers in Burns Harbor, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grant Street 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Frontier Rd 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Corporate - East Chicago 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AK Steel - Ashland Works 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gibson Generating Station 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCI Frankfort IN 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1557 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1655 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor 4,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC 3,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor (EIN 710871875) 238 FTE
NAT-TCR US Foods, Inc. Rosemont 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Conway 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Nissan EasternShore 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Ford Metairie 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8010150 PGW Tipton 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Experts, 164 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE 216 - Standale 357 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redwood City 357 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.