Hot-rolling iron or steel products in iron and steel mills · Indiana

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor

Burns Harbor, IN · ~4,021 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hot-rolling iron or steel products in iron and steel mills workplace, earning a grade A.

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Hot-rolling iron or steel products in iron and steel mills BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor safety composite

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2023

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor injury rate improved

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.3 in 2022 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.3 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Burns Harbor, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #11/42
  • PHOTO Nucor-Yamato Steel C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~4,021 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Hot-rolling iron or steel products in iron and steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor TCR series: 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor falls in its industry

416 Hot-rolling iron or steel prod establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 42 Hot-rolling iron or steel prod employers in Indiana.

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor (4,021 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor
Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor (4,021 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Cleveland Cliffs - Burns Harbor has more employees than the Hot-rolling iron or steel products in ir median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.5 44 0 0
2022 1.3 0.4 56 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · IN · Burns Harbor

416 Hot-rolling iron or steel products in iron and steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 18 employers in Burns Harbor, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor-Yamato Steel Co, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Levy Environmental Services Company dba Levy NYS Mill Service 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEMCO 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eli Lilly US AffiliateSales 3,973 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zimmer Biomet West Campus 4,088 FTE
STATE-SIZE Community Physicians Network 3,921 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4.63E+17 3,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC 3,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs - Corporate Burns Harbor - Corporate 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Corporate - Burns Harbor (EIN 710871875) 238 FTE
NAT-TCR R&R Pipeline Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CorrChoice Massillon 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wasatch Electric 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR McNeil Industries 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. David's North Austin Medical Center 4,020 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wright Tree Service, Inc 4,019 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Assembly (Yr 2011+) 4,031 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.