Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated · Ohio

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon

Napoleon, OH · ~127 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade B.

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon: 3.7 TCR = 64% of Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon safety composite

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2018

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon injury rate improved

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon's TCR fell 3.4 from 5.5 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Napoleon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 64% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #20/34
  • PHOTO CREST Logistics-CA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CREST Logistics-CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon averages 3.7 TCR (64% of the Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.1 · BLS 5.8

Where Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon falls in its industry

1,039 Public warehousing and storage establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 34 Public warehousing and storage employers in Ohio.

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon (127 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon
Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon (127 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon has more employees than the Public warehousing and storage, refriger median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2017 3.5 2.8 5 0 0
2016 5.5 3.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · OH · Napoleon

1,039 Public warehousing and storage, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 51 employers in Napoleon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CREST Logistics-CA 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allentown Refrigerated Terminals Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vortex Cold Storage 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carthage 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buurma Farms Inc. 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Window Company of Cincinnati, LLC 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Borden Dairy Company LLC (Cleveland, OH) 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE King's Command Foods, LLC - Versailles, Ohio 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filling Homes 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Filling Memorial Home of Mercy, Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR JAC Products Inc. 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Napoleon Facility 269 FTE
NAT-TCR Office/Plant 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #130 (River Falls, WI) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Nursing and Rehab 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kerrville Bus Company Inc. San Antonio Depot 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Automation --- Service Techniques 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manor Care Health Services - Williamsport North 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.