Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) · Tennessee

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital

Martin, TN · ~127 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade D.

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital safety composite

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2018

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital injury rate improved

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital's TCR fell 7.2 from 10.5 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Martin, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #27/41
  • PHOTO Select Specialty Hos…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Select Specialty Hospital - Tulsa/Midtown, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=3.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital falls in its industry

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 41 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce employers in Tennessee.

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital (127 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital
Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital (127 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Spire Cane Creek Rehabilitation Hospital has fewer employees than the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcohol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2017 5.5 2.2 5 0 0
2016 10.5 3.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TN · Martin

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 33 employers in Martin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Tulsa/Midtown, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Noland Hospital Anniston 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4244 CORNERSTONE HOSP SE ARIZONA 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4840 KH DALLAS CENTRAL 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dixie Roofing, Inc. - LaFollette 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE 001 Memphis TN Barnhart Plant Services LLC 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honest Abe Log Homes, Inc. 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Murfreesboro Container 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Consumer Group Martin 1,341 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Products Inc 1,316 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 107 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR 107 280 FTE
NAT-TCR 62-Williamsport Terminal 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Street 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Winnebago County 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RCX Georgia 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Napoleon 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerrville Bus Company Inc. San Antonio Depot 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Automation --- Service Techniques 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Idaho Milk Products 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.