Nursing homes · Texas

Clyde W. Cosper

Bonham, TX · ~177 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clyde W. Cosper runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Clyde W. Cosper: 1.6 TCR = 24% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clyde W. Cosper safety composite

Clyde W. Cosper scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Clyde W. Cosper injury rate improved

Clyde W. Cosper's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Bonham, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #142/1034
  • PHOTO Eatonton Health and …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eatonton Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Clyde W. Cosper in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clyde W. Cosper averages 1.6 TCR (24% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clyde W. Cosper TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Clyde W. Cosper falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 1034 Nursing homes employers in Texas.

Clyde W. Cosper (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Clyde W. Cosper
Clyde W. Cosper (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Clyde W. Cosper has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Bonham

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bonham, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eatonton Health and Rehabilitation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversicare Of Lake Highlands 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAY PARK CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR THM- Union City Nursing and Rehab 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MidSouth Electric Co-op 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primoris Distribution Services - Area 70 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105359 - Orange County Advanced Power Station 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE XIT Paving and Construction, INC. 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR 158 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 158 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Bonham 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Homes Bonham 191 FTE
NAT-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Charlotte 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CCS Group 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Woburn 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mount 07 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encoder Products Company 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terwilliger Plaza 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atek Metal Technologies 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.