541990 All Other Professional Scientific and Technical Services · Massachusetts

Woburn

Woburn, MA · ~288 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Woburn runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical 541990 All Other Professional Scientific and Technical Services workplace, earning a grade A.

Woburn: 1.6 TCR = 48% of 541990 All Other Professional Scientific and Technical Services BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Woburn safety composite

Woburn scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Woburn injury rate improved

Woburn's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Woburn, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/38
  • PHOTO ProMed Pharma
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~288 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ProMed Pharma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Woburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Woburn averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the 541990 All Other Professional Scientific and Technical Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Woburn TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Woburn falls in its industry

555 541990 All Other Professional establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 38 541990 All Other Professional employers in Massachusetts.

Woburn (288 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Woburn
Woburn (288 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Woburn has more employees than the 541990 All Other Professional Scientifi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.3 4.3 10 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.5 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · MA · Woburn

555 541990 All Other Professional Scientific and Technical Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 187 employers in Woburn, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ProMed Pharma 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rukel Management, LLC. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trilliant Surgical, LLC doing business as Enovis Foot & Ankle 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safariland LLC Airport 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilmington MA 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2341 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE 101 Main Street Cambridge MA 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Northeast Services-Boston 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Woburn_MA 1,364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marshalls Woburn Merchants, Inc 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woburn Marshalls Distribution Center 1,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEI Consultants, Inc. 837 FTE
NAT-TCR GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Charlotte 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR C2 Imaging - Kent 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CCS Group 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gems Sensors 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bway Cincinnati 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Native American Health Center 288 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeview Bus Lines 288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.