Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made in steel mills · South Carolina

CMC Steel South Carolina

Cayce, SC · ~418 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Steel South Carolina runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made in steel mills workplace, earning a grade A.

CMC Steel South Carolina: 1.2 TCR = 35% of Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made in steel mills BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Steel South Carolina safety composite

CMC Steel South Carolina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMC Steel South Carolina held a steady TCR band

CMC Steel South Carolina's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.9 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Cayce, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO USS Gary Works - Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~418 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USS Gary Works - Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CMC Steel South Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Steel South Carolina averages 1.2 TCR (35% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made in steel mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Steel South Carolina TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Steel South Carolina falls in its industry

416 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re employers in South Carolina.

CMC Steel South Carolina (418 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Steel South Carolina
CMC Steel South Carolina (418 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

CMC Steel South Carolina has more employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.8 8 0 0
2023 1.4 1.2 7 0 0
2022 1.2 1.0 6 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2019 1.1 0.9 5 0 0
2018 1.3 1.1 4 2 0
2017 1.9 1.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · SC · Cayce

416 Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar) made in steel mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 46 employers in Cayce, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USS Gary Works - Plant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland-Cliffs Butler Works 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 586 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLeod Health-Clarendon 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Spartanburg 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4503 Florence Mill 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR HISTORIC COLUMBIA SPEEDWAY 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Headquarters 606 FTE
CITY-NEAR OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTER 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 24X7 267 FTE
NAT-TCR R29TB - Riverbend Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arch Environmental Equipment Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Kansas State Univ Concessions 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JTS Construction 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Griswold Industries 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Office 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE 82 - St. Johns 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherburne County Government Center - General 418 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.