Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing · California

Griswold Industries

Costa Mesa, CA · ~418 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Griswold Industries runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Griswold Industries: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Griswold Industries safety composite

Griswold Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Griswold Industries injury rate improved

Griswold Industries's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=5.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=6.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Costa Mesa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Vortex Valves
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~418 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vortex Valves (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Griswold Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Griswold Industries averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Griswold Industries TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=5 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=6 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Griswold Industries falls in its industry

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Automatic (i.e., controlling-t employers in California.

Griswold Industries (418 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Griswold Industries
Griswold Industries (418 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Griswold Industries has more employees than the Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regul median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 16 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 19 0 0
2022 6.9 5.3 30 0 0
2021 1.9 1.7 8 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.0 4.1 22 3 0
2018 3.7 2.9 11 3 0
2017 5.0 4.8 18 0 0
2016 4.0 3.3 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · CA · Costa Mesa

298 Automatic (i.e., controlling-type, regulating) valves, industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 185 employers in Costa Mesa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vortex Valves 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Valve Company Inc. - Prairie du Sac 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Valve LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFT Inc 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andersen and Sons Shelling 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE Armorcast Products Company 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Industries 418 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4392 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACIFIC AMPHITHEATER 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR OC Fair & Event Center 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Costa Mesa 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACWEST Security Services 567 FTE
NAT-TCR JCC High School 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR H&R Const. Co. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Glass - 01 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Steel South Carolina 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Office 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE 82 - St. Johns 418 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherburne County Government Center - General 418 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.