Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Augusta Service Building

Augusta, ME · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Augusta Service Building runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Augusta Service Building: 5.6 TCR = 466% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Augusta Service Building safety composite

CMP - Augusta Service Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

CMP - Augusta Service Building injury rate improved

CMP - Augusta Service Building's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Augusta, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 466% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #25/28
  • PHOTO Gulf Coast Electric …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Augusta Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Augusta Service Building averages 5.6 TCR (466% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Augusta Service Building TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=4 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Augusta Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Augusta Service Building (75 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Augusta Service Building
CMP - Augusta Service Building (75 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Augusta Service Building has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2022 7.7 1.1 7 0 0
2021 6.2 4.7 4 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 4 0 0
2019 8.6 6.8 5 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 6.1 3.1 4 0 0
2016 7.0 4.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Augusta

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 73 employers in Augusta, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avista Clarkston 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 1630 MAIN 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric Distribution Cooperative 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knickerbocker Group 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyman Morse Boatbuilding 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unit # 1985 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE PWM PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL JETPORT 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR MaineGeneral Medical Center - Alfond Center for Health 2,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR CMP - Augusta General Office 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Northcenter - 0710 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2046 336 FTE
NAT-TCR Expi-Door Systems Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 801 Spring Creek Road 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Avista Clarkston 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bentleyville Giant Eagle 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cresline Plastic Pipe Company, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Briar Hill Health Campus 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springview Manor 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.