Refrigerated warehousing · Maryland

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.

Savage, MD · ~148 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. runs at 375% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refrigerated warehousing workplace, earning a grade F.

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.: 21.7 TCR = 375% of Refrigerated warehousing BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. safety composite

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.: 20.6 → 23.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 26.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2019

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 20.6 in 2016 to 23.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 26.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Savage, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 21.7 · 375% of ind

  • DART 23.0 DART
  • RANK #9/11
  • PHOTO Sierra Pacific Disti…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 130 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sierra Pacific Distibution Services 770 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. averages 21.7 TCR (375% of the Refrigerated warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=20.6 · 2017=26.1 · 2018=17.3 · 2019=23 · BLS 5.8

Where Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 11 Refrigerated warehousing employers in Maryland.

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (148 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (148 employees, TCR 21.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Co 18 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. has more employees than the Refrigerated warehousing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 23.0 23.0 32 0 0
2018 17.3 17.3 24 0 0
2017 26.1 26.1 41 0 0
2016 20.6 20.6 33 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · MD · Savage

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Savage, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sierra Pacific Distibution Services 770 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STOP & SHOP PDC DISTRIBUTION FREETOWN 22.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cordele SEFF 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merchants Cold Storage, LLC 21.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maryland Office 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Havtech Solutions, LLC 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE C021 Salisbury 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1122 LOWE S OF NEW CARROLLTON MD. 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freshly Inc. 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Pools, LLC 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kettle Cuisine 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intralox, LLC - Savage, MD 140 FTE
NAT-TCR San Francisco (Casan) 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Think All-In LLC 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Angeles Police Department, Northeast Division 21.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WCA San Diego 21.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sokaogon Gaming Enterprise Corporation 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Distribution Center 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE A&D Fire Sprinklers, Inc. - San Diego 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercer Forge Corporation 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.