Commercial building construction general contractors · Maryland

Coakley & Williams Construction

Bethesda, MD · ~146 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coakley & Williams Construction runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Coakley & Williams Construction: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coakley & Williams Construction safety composite

Coakley & Williams Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2023

Coakley & Williams Construction injury rate improved

Coakley & Williams Construction's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/99
  • PHOTO Sussex Development C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sussex Development Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Coakley & Williams Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coakley & Williams Construction averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coakley & Williams Construction TCR series: 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Coakley & Williams Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

Coakley & Williams Construction (146 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Coakley & Williams Construction
Coakley & Williams Construction (146 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Coakley & Williams Construction has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Bethesda

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sussex Development Corporation 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Office 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WL Port-Land Systems, Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BHS Corrugated North America 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Optical Laboratory 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daycon Products Company Inc. - Upper Marlboro 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100308 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Germain Hyundai 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Warehouse Company, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - DSM Tech Ops 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR South Point 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakefront Brewery 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro- Oregon Convention Center 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10445 Superior (WO) 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudy Construction 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.