Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Georgia

Cobb County

Marietta, GA · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cobb County runs at 503% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

Cobb County: 15.1 TCR = 503% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cobb County safety composite

Cobb County scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2020→2021

Cobb County injury rate improved

Cobb County's TCR fell 7.5 from 18.9 in 2020 to 11.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=18.9 · 2021=11.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Marietta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 503% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #184/188
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT SACRAMENTO…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT SACRAMENTO JOB CORPS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cobb County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cobb County averages 15.1 TCR (503% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cobb County TCR series: 2020=18.9 · 2021=11.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Cobb County falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #184 safest of 188 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Georgia.

Cobb County (26 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cobb County
Cobb County (26 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cobb County has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 18.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · GA · Marietta

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 350 employers in Marietta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SACRAMENTO JOB CORPS 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPEA 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Melissa 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BLUES CLUB 4 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE FPL Food Chatel Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Pine Grove, LA 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Athens Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Logging & Timber Co LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARIETTA PACKERS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Kennestone Hospital 5,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US GA Marietta S Cobb Dr (1169) 5,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) 5,205 FTE
NAT-TCR bpm Whitesburg, KY 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge in Georgetown LLC 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dorian Place 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02655 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Bi Products Estherville 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Charlotte 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 701-D002 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.