Metals service centers · Ohio

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield

Springfield, OH · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Metals service centers workplace, earning a grade A.

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield: 0.9 TCR = 39% of Metals service centers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield safety composite

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Springfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/130
  • PHOTO KenMac Metals - Clev…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KenMac Metals - Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield averages 0.9 TCR (39% of the Metals service centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield falls in its industry

1,299 Metals service centers establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 130 Metals service centers employers in Ohio.

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield (58 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield
Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield (58 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Coilplus, Inc. Ohio Division - Springfield has more employees than the Metals service centers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · OH · Springfield

1,299 Metals service centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 186 employers in Springfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KenMac Metals - Cleveland 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRC Global -152 Toledo, OH 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metals USA Muskogee, Ok 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metals USA Oakwood 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Meadow Farms 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspire Energy 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Companies, LLC - N Ohio 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCY 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Navistar Springfield Assembly Plant 1,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Regional Medical Center 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR VA Springfield 843 FTE
NAT-TCR Dormont Manufacturing Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid South Roller Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Belle Chasse Terminal 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KYTC Central Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roseville Galleria #412 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powell's Books -- Corporate office 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conrad Schmitt Studios, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartman Windows & Doors, LLC 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.