Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing · Minnesota

Cold Spring Brewing Company

Cold Spring, MN · ~577 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cold Spring Brewing Company runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cold Spring Brewing Company: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cold Spring Brewing Company safety composite

Cold Spring Brewing Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2020→2024

Cold Spring Brewing Company injury rate improved

Cold Spring Brewing Company's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.3 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Cold Spring, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO C286 Cincinnati PC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 104 inj
  • SIZE ~577 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C286 Cincinnati PC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cold Spring Brewing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cold Spring Brewing Company averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cold Spring Brewing Company TCR series: 2020=4.3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Cold Spring Brewing Company falls in its industry

516 Artificially carbonated waters establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Artificially carbonated waters employers in Minnesota.

Cold Spring Brewing Company (577 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cold Spring Brewing Company
Cold Spring Brewing Company (577 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Cold Spring Brewing Company has more employees than the Artificially carbonated waters manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.4 12 2 0
2023 3.6 3.0 25 0 0
2022 3.0 2.3 17 0 0
2021 5.2 3.2 26 0 0
2020 4.3 3.3 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · MN · Cold Spring

516 Artificially carbonated waters manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 15 employers in Cold Spring, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C286 Cincinnati PC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swire Coca-Cola of Tempe Production 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walcott St Warehouse Location #01 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake City Production 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hearth & Home Technologies 576 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independent School District #748 576 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center 576 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Veterans Home 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS PLANT 1,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS COLD SPRING - JFC- LLC 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cold Spring Granite Company 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 750 Rocori Middle & High Schools 188 FTE
NAT-TCR HS-CWS Call Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR UCHealth Highlands Ranch Hospital - EVS 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrated Power Services Denver Moline Service Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BayCare Behavioral Health (2610) 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vestas Blades America 577 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colleton County Government 577 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crew One Productions - Florida 577 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosaic 577 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.