Retirement communities, continuing care · North Carolina

College Walk Retirement

Brevard, NC · ~87 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

College Walk Retirement runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade B.

College Walk Retirement: 3.0 TCR = 80% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

College Walk Retirement safety composite

College Walk Retirement scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

College Walk Retirement: 3.5 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.8× in 2024

College Walk Retirement's TCR rose 5.1 from 3.5 in 2017 to 8.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Brevard, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 80% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #18/105
  • PHOTO Sylacauga Health & R…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sylacauga Health & Rehab Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

College Walk Retirement in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows College Walk Retirement averages 3.0 TCR (80% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

College Walk Retirement TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 3.8

Where College Walk Retirement falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 105 Retirement communities, contin employers in North Carolina.

College Walk Retirement (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate College Walk Retirement
College Walk Retirement (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

College Walk Retirement has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 8.5 5 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 7.3 1.8 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.5 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Brevard

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Brevard, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sylacauga Health & Rehab Services 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fargo Elim Assisted Living Pioneer House 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Layton Blvd. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bavarian Meadows 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Primoris T&D Services - Raleigh 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haynes Heating & Cooling 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE ENVIRONAMICS, INCORPORATED CHARLOTTE 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moody Dunbar, Inc 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR MH Transylvania Regional Hospital, LLLP 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaia Herbs 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 067 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tranysylvania Vocational Services, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-TCR Renaissance Nashville Hotel 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Westover Store 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunset GV LLC - dba Wildfire Casino & Lanes 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ames Main 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Lake Healthcare Center 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Compression Partners - Southeast 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw Electric Company 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Idabel Home Ownership Center/Transit Office 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.