Electric Power Distribution · Indiana

Columbus Operations Center

Columbus, IN · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Operations Center runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

Columbus Operations Center: 0.8 TCR = 64% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Operations Center safety composite

Columbus Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Columbus Operations Center: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Columbus Operations Center's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Columbus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/87
  • PHOTO Western District
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Operations Center averages 0.8 TCR (64% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Operations Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Columbus Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 87 Electric Power Distribution employers in Indiana.

Columbus Operations Center (51 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Operations Center
Columbus Operations Center (51 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Columbus Operations Center has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IN · Columbus

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western District 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SN1 Sanford Service Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Substation Maintenance Metro 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goldsboro Operations Center 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgBest, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dyer Construction Company, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3R Products & Services 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Indiana 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Goldsboro Operations Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Denver Co Distribution Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JTF Construction 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Prosper Operators, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burlington Operations Center 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quicken Steel LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Crest Alz 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamaica 1 Day Hab Offices 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.