Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging machinery manufacturing · Ohio

Combi Packaging Systems LLC

North Canton, OH · ~158 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Combi Packaging Systems LLC runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Combi Packaging Systems LLC: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Combi Packaging Systems LLC safety composite

Combi Packaging Systems LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2019→2024

Combi Packaging Systems LLC injury rate improved

Combi Packaging Systems LLC's TCR fell 3.0 from 6.4 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · North Canton, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #17/21
  • PHOTO Mechadyne Machine, I…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mechadyne Machine, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Combi Packaging Systems LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Combi Packaging Systems LLC averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Combi Packaging Systems LLC TCR series: 2019=6.4 · 2020=4.8 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Combi Packaging Systems LLC falls in its industry

269 Capping, sealing, and lidding establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 21 Capping, sealing, and lidding employers in Ohio.

Combi Packaging Systems LLC (158 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Combi Packaging Systems LLC
Combi Packaging Systems LLC (158 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Combi Packaging Systems LLC has more employees than the Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.7 5 0 0
2023 2.6 1.3 4 0 0
2020 4.8 2.0 7 0 0
2019 6.4 5.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · OH · North Canton

269 Capping, sealing, and lidding packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 142 employers in North Canton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mechadyne Machine, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Contract Packaging, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heat Seal, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ideal-Pak Incorporated 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Construction Company - Sidney 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City Erectors Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cincinnati Crisco Plant 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Valley Veneer 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR TestAmerica Laboratories Inc 1,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Canton HQ 1,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Absolute Rehabilitation and Consulting Services Inc 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diebold Nixdorf N.Canton NAO Field Services 470 FTE
NAT-TCR Interplex Engineered Products 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tncha - Chattanooga 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fldfb - Deerfield Village 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Exegistics Dallas 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Apple Rehab Laurel Woods 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE MWL Solutions Inc 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Paper 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABIMAR FOODS South 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.