HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Utah

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain

Salt Lake City, UT · ~80 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain: 0.8 TCR = 30% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain safety composite

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2023

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 30% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #6/58
  • PHOTO Hermanson - Oregon S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hermanson - Oregon State (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Comfort Systems USA Intermountain averages 0.8 TCR (30% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Comfort Systems USA Intermountain falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 58 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Utah.

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain (80 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Comfort Systems USA Intermountain
Comfort Systems USA Intermountain (80 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Comfort Systems USA Intermountain has more employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · UT · Salt Lake City

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hermanson - Oregon State 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VFP Fire Systems 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landmark Sprinkler Company 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Utah 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE JM Mechanical 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJ Masonry 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Etheredge Electric Company LLC Tyler 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rubbermaid Commercial Products 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Plymouth 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Starfire Energy 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charles R. Underwood, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Builders Choice Lumber LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luvata Appleton Carter Ct. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt ( Target Container) , Inc. 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.