Community development agencies, government · California

Community Development

Ventura, CA · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Development runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Community development agencies, government workplace, earning a grade A.

Community Development: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Community development agencies, government BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Development safety composite

Community Development scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Development: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Community Development's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925120 · Ventura, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO Housing Community De…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Housing Community Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Community Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Development averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Community development agencies, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Development TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Community Development falls in its industry

50 Community development agencies establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Community development agencies employers in California.

Community Development (35 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Development
Community Development (35 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Community Development has fewer employees than the Community development agencies, governme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.1 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925120 · CA · Ventura

50 Community development agencies, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Ventura, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Housing Community Development 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Naperville - Transportation, Engineering and Development 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Development 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neighborhood Services 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 447 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 530 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6292-00000001 2,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSA Human Service Agency 1,516 FTE
NAT-TCR Bridgewater Complex 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Civil LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynamic Transit Company 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Resin Supply, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sand Springs Home 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hibshman Screw Machine Products, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE LL Collision and Glass One, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County - Highway 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.