Housing programs, planning and development, government · North Carolina

Community & Economic Development Department

Asheville, NC · ~156 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community & Economic Development Department runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Housing programs, planning and development, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Community & Economic Development Department: 5.6 TCR = 176% of Housing programs, planning and development, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community & Economic Development Department safety composite

Community & Economic Development Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2019

Community & Economic Development Department injury rate improved

Community & Economic Development Department's TCR fell 2.9 from 6.6 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925110 · Asheville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 176% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Housing and Communit…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Housing and Community Development (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Community & Economic Development Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community & Economic Development Department averages 5.6 TCR (176% of the Housing programs, planning and development, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Community & Economic Development Department TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=3.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Community & Economic Development Department falls in its industry

54 Housing programs, planning and establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Housing programs, planning and employers in North Carolina.

Community & Economic Development Department (156 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community & Economic Development Department
Community & Economic Development Department (156 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Community & Economic Development Department has more employees than the Housing programs, planning and developme median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2018 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2017 6.6 6.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925110 · NC · Asheville

54 Housing programs, planning and development, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Housing and Community Development 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Housing and Community Development - Chapel Hill Office 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Housing Community Services 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHA - Mt. Airy Homes & Hi-Rise, Maintenance, Shop 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2807-0458 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEOLTA HOLDINGS LLC 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2907 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCHIK - HICKORY CENTER 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR Jolamar Corporation 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GNC-Appleton 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-Swy 0035 1559 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6850 S Tucson 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amcor Franklin 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 322 - Batavia 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 373 - Grandville 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2nd Street Clinic 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.