Industry profile · NAICS 925110

Housing programs, planning and development, government

Workplace injury rates across 62 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

62
Employers
4.7
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
637
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Housing programs, planning and development, government average 4.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

4.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
62
employers reporting
637
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Housing programs, planning and development, government Safety Data Reveals

The Housing programs, planning and development, government sector (NAICS 925110) encompasses 62 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 637 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Housing programs, planning and development, government that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Housing Authority of Billings BILLINGS, MT F 17.4
YAN Housing CAMP VERDE, AZ F 14.2
PHA - Roosevelt Homes, Management, Maintenance ST. PAUL, MN F 10.4
Northeast Oregon Housing Authority LA GRANDE, OR F 9.9
Section 8 Valley VAN NUYS, CA F 9.4
Housing Authority City of Waterbury WATERBURY, CT F 9.3
Housing Authority of Joliet JOLIET, IL F 9.3
Section 8 Inspection LOS ANGELES, CA F 8.4
Park City Communities BRIDGEPORT, CT F 8.1
Springfield Housing Authority SPRINGFIELD, MA F 7.5
Housing Authority of Paducah PADUCAH, KY F 7.3
Guilford County - Planning and Development GREENSBORO, NC F 6.6
New Bedford Housing NEW BEDFORD, MA F 6.6
PHA - McDonough Homes, Management, Maintenance ST. PAUL, MN D 6.3
Bay Area Housing Authority Risk Mgmt OAKLAND, CA D 6.3
Spartanburg Housing Authority SPARTANBURG, SC D 6.2
2017 Manchester Housing Authority MANCHESTER, CT D 6.2
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority MINNEAPOLIS, MN D 6.2
Housing Community Services TUCSON, AZ D 6.0
Orange County - Housing and Community Development - Chapel Hill Office CHAPEL HILL, NC D 6.0
Housing and Community Development TUCSON, AZ D 5.9
Community & Economic Development Department ASHEVILLE, NC D 5.6
PHA - Mt. Airy Homes & Hi-Rise, Maintenance, Shop ST. PAUL, MN D 5.1
Housing Opportunities of SW Washington LONGVIEW, WA D 4.9
MJ CONSULTING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. CAGUAS, PR D 4.7
City of Santa Rosa Housing & Community Services SANTA ROSA, CA D 4.7
Section 8 South TORRANCE, CA D 4.2
EHA EVANSVILLE, IN D 4.1
Brainerd Housing & Redevelopment Authority BRAINERD, MN D 4.0
Housing CASA GRANDE, AZ D 3.9
Project For Pride in Learning, Service Center MINNEAPOLIS, MN C 3.6
Housing Department CONCORD, NC C 3.1
Housing Authority of the City of Bellingham BELLINGHAM, WA C 3.1
Southeastern Minnesota Multi-County Housing & Redevelopment Authority WABASHA, MN C 3.0
RECURSOS EXTERNOS RIO GRANDE, PR B 2.2
City of Maryville MARYVILLE, TN B 2.1
City of Raleigh- Housing and Neighborhood RALEIGH, NC B 1.9
Rochester Housing Authority ROCHESTER, NY B 1.8
2600 Wilshire LOS ANGELES, CA B 1.8
Evansville Housing Authority EVANSVILLE, IN B 1.8
City of Tempe Community Development Department TEMPE, AZ A 1.6
Project For Pride in Living, Service Center MINNEAPOLIS, MN A 1.5
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division FRESNO, CA A 1.3
City of Greensboro Planning Department GREENSBORO, NC A 1.2
Housing and Community Development NORFOLK, VA A 1.1
HCIDLA Garland Bldg. LOS ANGELES, CA A 1.1
PHA - Central Admin Office/Scattered Sites ST. PAUL, MN A 1.1
Housing Commission ANN ARBOR, MI A 0.8
St. Clair County Housing Authority BELLEVILLE, IL A 0.7
PHA - Central Admin Office ST. PAUL, MN A 0.6
Page 1 of 2 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Housing programs, planning and development, government?

This sector averages 4.7 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.