Administration of Housing Programs · Arizona

Housing and Community Development

Tucson, AZ · ~123 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Housing and Community Development runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Administration of Housing Programs workplace, earning a grade D.

Housing and Community Development: 5.9 TCR = 186% of Administration of Housing Programs BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Housing and Community Development safety composite

Housing and Community Development scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Housing and Community Development: 4.4 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2022

Housing and Community Development's TCR rose 1.9 from 4.4 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925110 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 186% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Orange County - Hous…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orange County - Housing and Community Development - Chapel Hill Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Housing and Community Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Housing and Community Development averages 5.9 TCR (186% of the Administration of Housing Programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Housing and Community Development TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Housing and Community Development falls in its industry

54 Administration of Housing Prog establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Administration of Housing Prog employers in Arizona.

Housing and Community Development (123 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Housing and Community Development
Housing and Community Development (123 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Housing and Community Development has more employees than the Administration of Housing Programs median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.3 5.5 8 0 0
2021 6.2 5.3 7 0 0
2020 5.6 3.7 6 0 0
2019 5.4 5.4 6 0 0
2018 9.4 9.4 11 0 0
2017 4.4 2.6 5 0 0
2016 4.4 3.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925110 · AZ · Tucson

54 Administration of Housing Programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Housing and Community Development - Chapel Hill Office 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Housing Community Services 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Public Housing Authority 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2017 Manchester Housing Authority 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 852570000 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01207 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lehi Valley Trading Company 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Forum at Pueblo Norte 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre of Dallas 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NorthPointe Healthcare Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 314899-Las-Summerlin Sta 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 480120-Aledo Po 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ranger 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLF Graphics 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Janor 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056138-Pleasanton Po 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.