Building framing (except structural steel) · Maryland

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD

Columbia, MD · ~88 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building framing (except structural steel) workplace, earning a grade B.

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Building framing (except structural steel) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD safety composite

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2020

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD injury rate improved

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.1 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Columbia, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Standard Drywall, In…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Standard Drywall, Inc. - Lakeside CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Building framing (except structural steel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD falls in its industry

387 Building framing (except struc establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Building framing (except struc employers in Maryland.

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD (88 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD
Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD (88 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Component Assembly Systems Columbia MD has more employees than the Building framing (except structural stee median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 0.6 2 0 1
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · MD · Columbia

387 Building framing (except structural steel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 179 employers in Columbia, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Standard Drywall, Inc. - Lakeside CA 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howard Immel Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jessup FS (SSS,SAT) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Immel Construction 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 104648 - WMATA Contract 3 Blue/Green Lines 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gordon Contractors Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayoka Services, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field Sales 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard County General Hospital 1,952 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate HQ 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring, Inc 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring Inc - Columbia 586 FTE
NAT-TCR Frazee-Vergas Schools - HS 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Delaware Valley Society of Transplant Surgeons dba Gift of Life Donor Program 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Athens Regional Physician Services 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Construction Services, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stoughton MA 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE SDF Decatur 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birdon America Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augustana The Rosemount 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.