Employer · New Jersey

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA

Edison, NJ · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA: 1.9 TCR = 92% of industry BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA safety composite

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA held a steady TCR band

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/47
  • PHOTO 468 Borg Warner - Be…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 468 Borg Warner - Bellwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA averages 1.9 TCR (92% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 47 industry employers in New Jersey.

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA (20 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA
Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA (20 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NJ · Edison

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 468 Borg Warner - Bellwood 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunnyside 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin City Container Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JEM Doris Avenue 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 890 Charles St 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Power Generation Facility 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sayreville Power Plant 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakewood Cogeneration 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bidart Bros. et al 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RE Management Group Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Schneider Electric - Lincoln, Nebraska 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 44918 - Bradenton Fac 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Phoenix AZ-USA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Denver (Cosp) 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.