Employer · Minnesota

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA

Minneapolis, MN · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA: 1.7 TCR = 82% of industry BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA safety composite

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA: 0.0 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA's TCR rose 5.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/56
  • PHOTO Quality Welding, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Welding, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA averages 1.7 TCR (82% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 56 industry employers in Minnesota.

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA (20 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA
Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA (20 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Minneapolis MN-USA has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MN · Minneapolis

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Welding, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbon Equipment - Seattle 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northline Industrial, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loftin Equipment Company Headquarters 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE C74 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNSGA-SEL-SELECT GENETICS ADMIN' 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bees Minnesota 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glyndon 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Dawn Food Products - Manteno Manufacturing 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville - 008 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Swg Casa Grande Office 0032-Fac12 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Springs Hatchery 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Phoenix AZ-USA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Edison NJ-USA 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminix Service, Inc. Monroe 65- 37 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44918 - Bradenton Fac 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.