Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank farm or field, construction · North Carolina

Concord Tank Corporation

Concord, NC · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concord Tank Corporation runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank farm or field, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Concord Tank Corporation: 2.4 TCR = 84% of Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank farm or field, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concord Tank Corporation safety composite

Concord Tank Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Concord Tank Corporation held a steady TCR band

Concord Tank Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Concord, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO LANTIER CONSTRUCTION…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LANTIER CONSTRUCTION CO. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Concord Tank Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concord Tank Corporation averages 2.4 TCR (84% of the Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank farm or field, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concord Tank Corporation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Concord Tank Corporation falls in its industry

809 Storage tank, natural gas or o establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Storage tank, natural gas or o employers in North Carolina.

Concord Tank Corporation (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Concord Tank Corporation
Concord Tank Corporation (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Concord Tank Corporation has fewer employees than the Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · NC · Concord

809 Storage tank, natural gas or oil, tank farm or field, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LANTIER CONSTRUCTION CO. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Burlington-60G4 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRS PETROLEUM SERVICES CORP 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watkins Construction Co. Inc., dba Johnston Vacuum tank 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - NCC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Sandhill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cowans Ford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craven County Wood Energy 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR George J. Igel & Co., Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewater Technical Associates LLC. Los Alamos Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR East Liverpool Giant Eagle 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Town Hall 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE INDYO 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanion Wholesale Electric Co., Inc.-Wichita, KS 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE UBU 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE UBF 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.