Concrete repair · Maryland

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc.

Baltimore, MD · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Concrete repair workplace, earning a grade B.

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Concrete repair BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. safety composite

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2019→2024

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. injury rate improved

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.9 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO C & J Concrete Found…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C & J Concrete Foundations, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Concrete repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete repair establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Concrete repair employers in Maryland.

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. (62 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc.
Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. (62 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Concrete Protection and Restoration, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete repair median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 3 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MD · Baltimore

1,314 Concrete repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C & J Concrete Foundations, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Way 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth Civil Construction, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cunningham-Davis Corp 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Contracting Company, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volvo Baltimore RDC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - Exelon, Calvert Cliffs Station 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&J Service, Inc. 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Enjet Aero Erie, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Independent Investors, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooper Oates Air Conditioning 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McFarlanes' Retail and Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nia, LLC. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lions Volunteer Blind Industries - 1 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeward Bound Corporate 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE CONWAY 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.